Bhavin Vadodariya: Not Every Oral Cancer Needs a Flap
Bhavin Vadodariya/LinkedIn

Bhavin Vadodariya: Not Every Oral Cancer Needs a Flap

Bhavin Vadodariya, Consultant Surgical Oncologist at SSO Cancer Hospital and Clinics, PSM Hospital, and Shankus Hospitals, shared a post on LinkedIn:

“Not Every Oral Cancer Needs a Flap A Real Case.

A 37-year-old male presented with a 4*3 cm ulcerative lesion in the upper gingivobuccal sulcus, buccal mucosa.

Background: Grade 2 OSMF, mouth opening ~2 fingers.

His priority was very clear:

  • No reduction in mouth opening. No visible scars in any part of body so he can conceal whether he has undergone surgery.

Intraoperative findings

  • Depth ~4 mm.
  • Base: buccinator muscle.
  • Final defect: ~5 × 5 cm (upper alveolus – RMT region).
  • Margins: negative on frozen section.

Now the key question: Flap vs function.

Reconstruction strategy

  • Buccal fat pad (vascular base).
  • Overlaid with Matriderm.
  • Secured with Vicryl + Jelonet bolster.

A hybrid, function-first reconstruction.

Outcome (4 weeks)

  • Complete mucosalization.
  • No contracture.
  • Mouth opening preserved.
  • No external scars.

Exactly what the patient asked for.

So where do dermal matrices fit?

In superficial buccal mucosa defects with preserved muscle bed, dermal matrices like Matriderm offer a strong middle ground between primary closure and flap reconstruction.

Where it works best

  • T1-T2 superficial defects.
  • No bone exposure / no through-and-through loss.
  • When flap morbidity can be avoided.

Why it works.

A collagen–elastin scaffold that promotes:

  • Neovascularization.
  • Fibroblast ingrowth.
  • Rapid epithelialization.

Result: Faster, more predictable healing with less contracture vs secondary intention.

Clinical advantages

  • No donor-site morbidity.
  • Reduced OT time.
  • Good functional outcomes (speech, mastication).
  • Particularly useful in OSMF / borderline cases.

When NOT to use

  • Deep defects.
  • Bone exposure.
  • Irradiated / infected beds.

In these situations, flaps still win. Matriderm (~₹15–25k) can avoid unnecessary free flaps (₹2.5–4L+) in selected patients.

We often jump from ‘closure’ – ‘flap.’

But there is a missing middle layer in oral reconstruction and dermal matrices occupy it elegantly.

Better selection = better surgery.

The real skill is not just doing a flap. It’s knowing when NOT to do one.

Would you have chosen a flap in this case?”

Bhavin Vadodariya

Other articles about Oral Cancer on OncoDaily.