Al-Ola Abdallah: New Data on Cilta-cel in High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma from CAR-PRISM Trial Phase 2
Al-Ola A. Abdallah/LinkedIn

Al-Ola Abdallah: New Data on Cilta-cel in High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma from CAR-PRISM Trial Phase 2

Al-Ola Abdallah, Board Member at Kansas Society OF Clinical Oncology, Associate Professor of Medicine, Assistant Professor at University of Kansas Medical Center, shared a post on X:

Cilta-cel in High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma (CAR-PRISM, Phase 2)

Groundbreaking – but let’s stay critical and take a look at this closely from all angles.

1. Concept shift: Treating precursor disease (HR-SMM) with CAR-T

Aim: intercept progression, maybe even cure.

Rationale:

  • Lower tumor burden
  • Better T-cell fitness
  • Less immune exhaustion

2. Study design

  • Phase 2, single-center
  • n = 20 treated patients
  • No induction, no bridging
  • Cilta-cel upfront
  1. Primary: safety
  2. Secondary: MRD, response

3. Efficacy = Not surprising

  •  100% MRD negativity (10⁻⁶) by ~2 months
  • 90% CR/sCR
  • No progression or deaths (median FU 15.3 mo)

Fast + deep + sustained responses

  • All patients MRD(-) at 10⁻⁶
  • Sustained across timepoints

Compared to prior trials:

  • KRd-based strategies ~50-60% MRD(-)
  • CAR-T clearly deeper

Let’s get into business

4. Toxicity profile

  • CRS: 100% (ALL grade 1–2)
  • Cytopenias: common but transient
  • NINTs (non-ICANS neurotoxicity): 35%

Cranial nerve palsies + movement disorders

New neurotoxicity phenotype emerging.

5. Neurotoxicity signal (important!)

  • Associated with elevated CAR-T expansion and ALC
  • Some persistent grade 1 symptoms

Raises concern for:

  • Parkinsonian features
  • Long-term neurologic risk

Mechanism still unclear.

6. Critiques/Limitations

  • Small sample size (n=20)
  • No statistical power
  • Rare toxicities likely missed

Signals ≠ definitive conclusions

7. Single-arm, no comparator

  • No randomized control
  • Cannot compare vs:
    • Dara
    • KRd-based early intervention

Magnitude of benefit unclear.

8. Short follow-up (15 months)

  • SMM is a long disease course

Key unanswered:

  • Are we curing disease?
  • Or just delaying progression?

Durability remains unknown.

9. Overtreatment risk

SMM ≠ always destined to progress

Treating all HR-SMM with CAR-T:

  • Cost
  • Toxicity
  • Resource burden

Risk-benefit balance unclear.

10. Neurotoxicity concerns

  • Novel NINTs (movement disorders)
  • Some persistent

In asymptomatic patients – big issue

Tolerance threshold is much lower vs RRMM

11. No QoL data

  • Hospitalization
  • Toxicity burden
  • Long-term function

Critical in asymptomatic population.

12. Big picture takeaways

Proof-of-concept: CAR-T can induce deep MRD(-) in SMM

But:

  • Not practice-changing yet
  • Needs randomized trials + long-term data

Bottom Line: I will not feel comfortable to treat HRSMM with Cilta-Cel!

Even on a clinical trial.”

Title: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: the CAR-PRISM phase 2 trial

Read the article.

Al-Ola Abdallah

Other articles featuring Al-Ola Abdallah on OncoDaily.