June, 2025
June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
Roupen Odabashian: Artificial Intelligence as a Clinical Decision Support tool for Lung Cancer Treatment Recommendations
Jun 2, 2025, 13:25

Roupen Odabashian: Artificial Intelligence as a Clinical Decision Support tool for Lung Cancer Treatment Recommendations

Roupen Odabashian, Hematology/Oncology Fellow at the Karmanos Cancer Institute, shared a post on LinkedIn:

“Publications alert news from ASCO 2025!
Proud to share that our abstract was accepted for publication at the ASCO Annual Meeting, evaluating artificial intelligence as a clinical decision support (CDS) tool for lung cancer treatment recommendations.
We put GPT-4 and Claude Opus—two advanced large language models—to the test on real-world, de-identified lung cancer cases from our clinic at Karmanos Cancer Institute.
With blinded evaluations by board-certified thoracic oncologists from NCI-designated centers, we looked at:
  • Accuracy of treatment recommendations.
  • Comprehensiveness of care (medical, surgical, and supportive).
  • Presence of hallucinations or potentially harmful advice.
Key takeaways:
– GPT-4 scored significantly higher in accuracy and trustworthiness than Claude.
– But even the best-performing AI generated harmful or inaccurate responses in a notable percentage of cases.
1 in 3 recommendations from both models raised red flags — a clear signal that LLMs aren’t ready for unsupervised clinical deployment.
This study is a step forward in understanding where AI fits—and doesn’t—in oncology care at this stage. It’s a reminder: we need to use these tools carefully, with rigorous validation, human oversight, and constant iteration.
Grateful to our incredible multi-institutional team and mentors across Karmanos Cancer Institute, Mayo Clinic, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and beyond.”

Roupen Odabashian shared research accepted at ASCO 2025 evaluating large language models GPT-4 and Claude Opus as clinical decision support tools for lung cancer. Findings show GPT-4 performed better, but both models occasionally generated unsafe recommendations, underscoring the need for oversight in AI-assisted oncology care.

More posts featuring Roupen Odabashian.