Zainab Shinkafi-Bagudu: I See Cervical Cancer as a Stark Reflection of Global Health Inequity
Zainab Shinkafi-Bagudu / LinkedIn

Zainab Shinkafi-Bagudu: I See Cervical Cancer as a Stark Reflection of Global Health Inequity

Zainab Shinkafi-Bagudu, UICC President-Elect of 2024-2026 and a Founder and CEO of the Medicaid Cancer Foundation, shared a post with an article on LinkedIn:

“While Nigeria has vaccinated 17 million girls since 2023, the path to cervical cancer elimination is blocked by a critical reality: 90% of cases are still diagnosed at advanced stages due to systemic failures in data, screening, and community trust.

Drawing from my perspective as president-elect of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and CEO of the Medicaid Cancer Foundation, this analysis breaks down the three essential shifts required to move from progress to elimination:

  • Solving the Data Crisis: Moving beyond fragmented systems to capture the thousands of “invisible” women currently missing from national registries.
  • Neutralizing Misinformation: Why our research shows that local messengers and religious leaders are more effective than leaflets in countering anti-vaccine narratives.
  • The Affordability Wall: Addressing why high kit costs have stalled screening coverage at a mere 15%, far below our national goals.

We are at a turning point where medical science must be met with social trust. I’d like you to read the full insights on how Nigeria can bridge these gaps.

Nigeria’s path to cervical cancer elimination: Challenges, data, and people-centred care

“As the President-elect of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and the CEO and founder of the Medicaid Cancer Foundation, I see cervical cancer for what it truly is: a stark reflection of global health inequity.”

Cervical cancer, despite being one of the preventable cancers, is also a disease that represents great inequities in health outcomes, with a disproportionate number of deaths carried by low- and middle-income countries. In high-income countries with robust health systems and some lower-resource settings, such as Rwanda, that have managed to prioritize their response to the disease, routine vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV) that causes cervical cancer, routine screening for precancerous lesions, and timely treatment of the disease have contributed to significantly reducing the number of related deaths.

While high-income nations like Australia are on the verge of eliminating this disease by 2035, approximately 94% of the 350,000 annual deaths still occur in low- and middle-income countries, with the heaviest burden falling on sub-Saharan Africa.

Indeed, Australia recently announced that it recorded zero cases in 2021 of cervical cancer in women under the age of 25 (latest available data), recognizing the huge benefit of HPV vaccination, and is on target to eliminate the disease by 2035. Poorer countries, mostly in the global south, display systemic weaknesses that greatly contribute to delayed diagnosis, alongside limited access to prevention and treatment. As a result, about 94% of the 350,000 deaths caused by cervical cancer occur in low- and middle-income countries. Thus, the highest rates of incidence and mortality are in sub-Saharan Africa, Central America, and Southeast Asia.

In Nigeria, these challenges are especially acute, despite effective strides and political commitment towards eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem. As the global health community marks Cervical Cancer Awareness Month in January, gaps remain in data collection, access to prevention and care services, and community engagement that hinder national efforts.

Most women in Nigeria are diagnosed only when the disease is far advanced, with around 90% of cervical cancer cases presenting at stage three or four.

This reflects low awareness of symptoms, the absence of routine screening, and gaps in access to care that mean many women remain undiagnosed and untreated until the disease is severe. A real problem, right from the outset, is the lack of reliable data. The cancer registration system is weak, and so the way the government at all levels responds, and even how people respond, is not ideal. A lot of women are therefore undiagnosed and untreated, and we don’t capture them because we don’t know they exist.

For many years, Nigeria’s cancer registration system was fragmented and inaccessible to key stakeholders. It was also previously housed within a single institution, limiting collaboration and data sharing. Recently, however, responsibility has shifted to Nigeria’s National Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, which has begun overhauling the country’s data collection system. It is working with the African Cancer Registry Network, with the support of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, to expand registries, deploy updated software, and build human capacity.

Hopefully, we will soon see better, more robust cancer registries with more capacity, both in terms of human capacity and tools. Only then will we be able to capture more precisely what is actually going on – and act on that knowledge. The aim is to develop a more inclusive and functional system with trained personnel and modern tools so that data accurately reflect the scope of cancer cases in the country – a necessary foundation for policy, funding, and care.

Since the introduction of the HPV vaccine in Nigeria in 2023, the country has achieved notable reach in vaccinating approximately 17 million girls between the ages of 9 and 15; however, this is out of a total eligible population of an estimated 60 million girls. This is largely below the goal of 90% of the target population by 2030 laid out in the WHO’s Global Strategy to eliminate cervical cancer. Misinformation remains a substantial barrier to full coverage. Anti-vaccine narratives, often distributed through WhatsApp in multiple local languages, continue to undermine public trust.

“In a pilot study conducted by my team at the Medicaid Cancer Foundation, comprehensive education campaigns proved effective, showing vaccine uptake was not significantly affected by misinformation when there was early and sustained engagement of the general public and awareness was raised around the benefits of vaccination. We spent almost two years educating the students, as well as the teachers and other community gatekeepers. What it shows is that with the right preparation and the right information, you can preempt the misinformation.”

In contrast, the recent national vaccine rollout was hampered by insufficient communication. Many families, especially in rural areas, did not receive clear, accessible information about the HPV vaccine. Mothers were not adequately engaged or educated, so some would allow vaccination, and others wouldn’t. These leaflets, jingles, and flyers – how many people can read them?. Effective outreach requires not just materials but trusted messengers and local engagement strategies adapted to the context.

Misinformation and anti-vaccine sentiment can be countered by reaching out to influential religious communities. I recently passed by a church with thousands in attendance, implying a trust and belief in the church structure. Any message that is passed there will be easily accepted. That is where we can effectively shift the narrative from prejudice and anti-vaccine sentiment to understanding the enormous health benefits of HPV vaccination.

Still, the fact that 17 million girls in Nigeria have received the HPV vaccine in only two years marks significant progress, as it is a significant number given the size and complexity of the national population. We could have done worse – but we did well, and efforts are ongoing. Better coordination and community communication are needed to reach more girls and counter misinformation more effectively. While Nigeria still benefits from Gavi support, and the endorsement by WHO of the effectiveness of a single-dose HPV vaccine can help reduce costs and increase reach, the sustainability of vaccination at scale remains uncertain long-term.

At the heart of Nigeria’s efforts to implement the three pillars of cervical cancer elimination – vaccination, screening for precancerous lesions, and timely treatment – is the National Task Force on Cervical Cancer Elimination. The task force has grown into a broad-based partnership that brings together government bodies, development agencies, and civil society organizations. As the vice chair of this task force, I am working to implement a screening strategy, as recommended by WHO, that relies primarily on HPV testing. The initiative includes training and ongoing support for primary healthcare workers, enabling them to deliver screening services at the community level.

While screening efforts are progressing, affordability remains a major barrier, particularly when it comes to HPV testing kits. If manufacturers are unable to bring the costs down, if they stay at the current high level, it’s going to be really hard for us to keep the program going on the scale we need. High costs are making it difficult to plan and to reach the number of women we’re aiming for. The target is to screen 50% of eligible women and treat all detected precancerous lesions by 2027, as part of Nigeria’s national goals. Current coverage, however, is about 15%, and it’s unlikely, going by the current rate, that the country will meet its goal.

On access to treatment for those diagnosed, three funding streams have emerged: the National Health Insurance Fund (targeting cancer, renal, and cardiovascular diseases), the Cancer Health Fund (operating via e-wallets in seven tertiary centers), and private sector-led initiatives. Yet the system remains difficult to navigate. Even in urban areas, many people don’t know about interventions. The awareness of the funds is not widespread, and doctors, often overstretched, are unable to offer full guidance.

Civil society organizations, including the Medicaid Cancer Foundation and many other UICC members, are helping people with cancer understand and access financial support, but their reach is limited. Nigeria’s experience demonstrates that achieving elimination is not solely a medical task but one requiring social trust, inclusive policy, and local engagement.

We are doing something, and it is a lot more than we were doing in the past – in a properly researched and evaluated way.

Other articles featuring Zainab Shinkafi-Bagudu on OncoDaily.