Mohamed Omar, Assistant Professor at Cedars-Sinai, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“Today I received this very insightful and personalized peer review for a manuscript at a ‘reputable’ journal. Not a single figure referenced. Not one method named. Not a single result discussed. Just five immaculate paragraphs that apply equally well to a genomics paper, a clinical trial, and a 9th-grade book report.
Reviewer 1 didn’t review our paper. Reviewer 1 prompted ChatGPT with ‘act as a tough but fair peer reviewer’ and called it a day. One would expect this from Reviewer 2, but Reviewer 1 has no excuse!
The editor read this (hopefully) and thought: yes, this is useful feedback. The future of academic publishing is here and it is truly magnificent.”
Other articles about AI in Oncology on OncoDaily.