Brandon Luu: A new twin study has strengthened the link between tattoos and cancer risk
Brandon Luu, Resident Physician in Internal Medicine at University of Toronto, shared a post on X:
“A new twin study has strengthened the link between tattoos and cancer risk.
For tattoos larger than a palm:
- 137% higher risk of skin cancer (HR = 2.37).
- 173% higher risk of lymphoma (HR = 2.73).
Let’s break it down.
Tattoo ink doesn’t just stay in the skin—it can migrate to the lymph nodes and other organs.
Some ink components, like carbon black and azo compounds, contain potentially carcinogenic substances. This study examined whether tattoo exposure is linked to cancer risk.
Synchrotron-based ν-XRF mapping and μ-FTIR microscopy enable to look into the fate and effects of tattoo pigments in human skin.
Authors: Ines Schreiver, et al.
Researchers analyzed data from 2,367 twins in a cohort study and 316 twins in a case-control study.
Twin studies help control for genetic and environmental factors, providing a stronger assessment of risk.
Tattooed individuals had a 62% higher risk of skin cancer (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.08–2.41).
Large tattoos (> palm size) were linked to even greater risks:
Skin cancer HR: 2.37 (95% CI: 1.11–5.06).
Lymphoma HR: 2.73 (95% CI: 1.33–5.60).\
Tattoo exposure was associated with 3.91x higher risk of skin cancer (95% CI: 1.42–10.8).
Basal cell carcinoma risk was 2.83x higher (95% CI: 1.30–6.16). These findings suggest a possible dose-response effect.
What could explain this link?’
The study authors propose that tattoo ink triggers chronic inflammation at the deposit site, which may lead to abnormal cell proliferation.
Ink components like carbon black and azo compounds could also play a role in carcinogenesis.
Tattoo inks are toxicological risks to human health: A systematic review of their ingredients, fate inside skin, toxicity due to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, primary aromatic amines, metals, and overview of regulatory frameworks.
Authors: Sandeep Negi, et al.
Alternative explanations?
Tattoos could delay cancer detection if skin changes are hidden. Sun exposure could be a confounder—tattooed skin may receive more UV exposure.
Lifestyle factors (e.g., smoking) were considered but did not fully explain the association.
Study Strengths: Used twin comparisons to control for genetics & environment.
Examined real-world tattoo exposure instead of lab models. Applied time-to-event analysis, accounting for when tattoos were acquired relative to cancer diagnosis.
Limitations: No data on specific ink types or colors (except red, which showed no effect).
Basal cell carcinoma was excluded from the twin case-control study. Bladder cancer sample was too small to analyze. Sun exposure wasn’t directly measured.
With tattoos becoming more common, understanding their long-term safety is essential.
More research is needed to clarify if and how tattoo ink contributes to cancer risk, raise awareness if a strong link exists, and explore ways to reduce potential harm for those already tattooed.
In summary, this study suggests an increased risk of skin cancer and lymphoma among tattooed individuals, especially with larger tattoos.
While causation isn’t proven, caution is warranted—and more research is needed.
Tattoo ink exposure is associated with lymphoma and skin cancers – a Danish study of twins.
Authors: Signe Bedsted Clemmensen, et al.
-
Challenging the Status Quo in Colorectal Cancer 2024
December 6-8, 2024
-
ESMO 2024 Congress
September 13-17, 2024
-
ASCO Annual Meeting
May 30 - June 4, 2024
-
Yvonne Award 2024
May 31, 2024
-
OncoThon 2024, Online
Feb. 15, 2024
-
Global Summit on War & Cancer 2023, Online
Dec. 14-16, 2023