Carboplatin Versus Cisplatin in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer

Carboplatin Versus Cisplatin in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer

Presented during the Head and Neck Cancer Oral Abstract Session at the 2026 ASCO Annual Meeting, Jian Guan, MD, shared phase III data comparing carboplatin-based versus cisplatin-based induction and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

The study’s first author was Xiaoqing Wang, with Jian Guan, MD, serving as presenter.

This randomized non-inferiority trial evaluated whether carboplatin could offer comparable efficacy to cisplatin while reducing treatment-related toxicity and improving tolerability.

Study Design

This multicenter, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase III trial was conducted across six institutions in China.

Patients with newly diagnosed, non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma and stage III–IVA disease were randomly assigned to receive either carboplatin-based or cisplatin-based treatment.

Both groups received two cycles of induction chemotherapy, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with the assigned platinum agent for two or three cycles.

The primary endpoint was 3-year failure-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional failure-free survival, and toxicity. Non-inferiority was met if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the difference in 3-year failure-free survival did not exceed 10%.

Key Results

From April 16, 2018, to August 7, 2024, a total of 482 patients were enrolled and randomized equally between the carboplatin and cisplatin groups.

After a median follow-up of 40.0 months, the 3-year failure-free survival was 85.7% in the carboplatin group and 87.6% in the cisplatin group. The difference met the study’s predefined criteria for non-inferiority.

The stratified hazard ratio was 1.234 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.744–2.045, and the non-inferiority p value was 0.0112.

The cisplatin group had higher rates of several toxicities, including grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and anorexia, as well as more nausea, vomiting, and nephrotoxicity. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Why This Matters

These findings suggest that carboplatin-based induction and concurrent chemoradiotherapy may be a reasonable alternative for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, especially when cisplatin toxicity or tolerability is a concern.

The trial is clinically relevant because it addresses a common treatment challenge: maintaining disease control while improving treatment compliance and reducing toxicity.

Conclusion

In this randomized phase III non-inferiority trial, carboplatin-based induction and concurrent chemoradiotherapy showed comparable 3-year failure-free survival to cisplatin-based treatment in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, with a more favorable toxicity profile.

Longer follow-up will be important to confirm the durability of this promising regimen.

Abstract link