A US skin cancer testing company has agreed to settle allegations that it billed Medicare for potentially unreliable melanoma tests. DermTech Inc., now known as DTech Liquidating Inc., agreed to a settlement valued at up to $5 million, the US Department of Justice announced on August 26. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2024 and is now being liquidated.
The case concerns a noninvasive test that was designed to help doctors decide whether a suspicious skin lesion should be biopsied. Clinicians used adhesive patches to collect cells from the lesion’s surface, and the sample was analyzed for RNA markers associated with melanoma.
Medicare provided limited coverage for the test when a doctor was considering whether to perform a biopsy. It was intended to provide additional information rather than replace the doctor’s assessment of the lesion, the patient’s history and other clinical findings. Federal prosecutors say DermTech continued billing Medicare even when two separate testing problems raised questions about the reliability of its results.
Questions Over Test Reliability
The first issue occurred between October 2022 and March 2023, when DermTech changed the positive control range for one of the test’s two main melanoma markers. A positive control helps a laboratory confirm that a test is working properly. The government alleges that DermTech had not validated the new range. Without that validation, the company could not confirm that the control was functioning or that the test results were accurate.
The second issue involved samples tested between January 2020 and February 2022. According to the Justice Department, some samples did not contain enough patient RNA to be analyzed reliably. DermTech nevertheless allegedly produced positive or negative results, reported them to patients and their doctors, and billed Medicare for the tests.
The government also says that when concerns were raised, DermTech did not withdraw the affected results or adequately reimburse Medicare.
It remains unclear how many patients received the tests, how many results may have been inaccurate and how much Medicare paid for them. The Justice Department has not identified a patient whose melanoma was missed or who underwent an unnecessary biopsy because of an affected result. Still, the reliability of the results mattered because the test could influence what happened next.
A positive result could contribute to a decision to biopsy a lesion. A negative result could be considered alongside the lesion’s appearance and the patient’s medical history when deciding whether to monitor it rather than perform an immediate biopsy. An unreliable positive result could contribute to an avoidable procedure, while an unreliable negative result could provide false reassurance. These are possible risks based on the intended use of the test. The settlement does not establish that either occurred in a particular patient.
What the Settlement Means
Although the settlement is valued at up to $5 million, it does not require an immediate $5 million cash payment. DermTech filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in June 2024 after reviewing its financial and strategic options. The company planned to sell substantially all its assets while continuing to process test orders during the bankruptcy proceedings.
As part of the settlement, the United States received an allowed general unsecured claim of $5,038,011 in the bankruptcy case. This means the government can receive a share of the money distributed to unsecured creditors. The final recovery could be lower and will depend on how much remains available in the bankruptcy estate. The allegations apply to the former DermTech Inc., now DermTech Liquidating Inc. They do not apply to DermTech LLC, which purchased the former company’s assets in 2024 and continued operations under new ownership.
How the Case Started
The case began with a lawsuit filed by a former DermTech employee under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act. The law allows private individuals to bring cases on behalf of the US government when they believe false claims have been submitted for public money. Whistleblowers may receive part of any amount the government recovers.
The former employee, identified in court records as Ms. Luong, will receive 20% of the money the government ultimately collects through the bankruptcy case. The settlement resolves the government’s civil claims, but it is not an admission of wrongdoing. DTech denied the allegations, and no court has determined that the company violated the law.
The case highlights the importance of laboratory quality controls when test results are used to guide decisions about cancer biopsies. It also shows how concerns about test reliability can become an issue not only for patients and doctors, but also for Medicare and federal regulators.
Written by Evelina Khachaturova