Katy Beckermann: Why Genomics and NCCN Don’t Always Align
Katy Beckermann/LinkedIn

Katy Beckermann: Why Genomics and NCCN Don’t Always Align

Katy Beckermann, Medical Director of GU Clinical Research at Tennessee Oncology, shared a post on X:

“His NCCN risk says treat. His genomics says low-risk.

  • 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score in 409 men on active surveillance, surgery, or radiation (median follow-up 6+ yr)
  • “Discordant low-risk” (NCCN ≥2 but low GPS) was common: 46% of NCCN≥2 on active surveillance, up to 57% in the surgery group
  • 6-yr event-free survival 88-100% in these men, similar to the 100% in men low-risk by both GPS and NCCN
  • Retrospective, and “event-free” was defined against metastasis and EAU high-risk biochemical recurrence

Why this matters for your practice:

A group carries higher clinical risk but looks indolent by genomics. This warrants prospective study, not ready for prime time.

Where’s your threshold to act on a genomic classifier over NCCN?”

Katy Beckermann

Other articles about GU Oncology on OncoDaily.