April, 2025
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
Kevin Jang: Stereotactic reirradiation for in-field lung cancer recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
Apr 21, 2025, 16:37

Kevin Jang: Stereotactic reirradiation for in-field lung cancer recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

Kevin Jang, Radiation Oncology Advanced Trainee at Royal North Shore Hospital, shared a post on X about a paper he co-authored with colleagues published in Radiotherapy and Oncology:

“Stereotactic reirradiation for in-field lung cancer recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis”

Authors: Kevin Jang, Shamira Cross, Roland Yeghiaian-Alvandi.

Kevin Jang: Stereotactic reirradiation for in-field lung cancer recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

“Pleased to share our latest work in Radiotherapy and Oncology.

In-field lung re-SABR achieves excellent outcomes with low toxicities.

Size, dose, timing matters. Best results seen in recurrent tumours <2cm, cumulative BED ≥200 Gy, and interval >12 months.

Can you safely re-SABR lung cancers that recur in-field after SABR?

In-field LR occur in 10-15% and salvage options are limited.

  • Surgery: often inoperable
  • Ablation: high risk
  • Systemic therapy: limited local control

Could repeat SABR offer a curative path?

We conducted the first meta-analysis on this cohort across 12 studies involving 197 patients

  • Pooled 1-yr LC: 78.2%
  • Pooled 2-yr LC: 68.0%
  • Median OS: 26.3 mo
  • ≥G3 tox: <3%

So what predicts better outcomes?

  • Tumor size <2 cm
  • Cumulative BED ≥200 Gy
  • Interval >12 months between SABR courses

Size. Dose. Timing. All critically influence local control.

What about toxicity?

  • Pneumonitis ≥ Grade 2: 6.4%
  • Grade 3 events: rare
  • Grade 4–5 toxicity: only in central tumors
  • Peripheral lesions had excellent safety profiles.

Key takeaway: location matters for reirradiation safety.”